CIRAD (Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique Pour le Developpement)

Montpellier cedex 5, France · Member ID: 8257 · 5,088 total works

Global Rank

#2,833

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 10%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2831SDU Journal of Natural and Applied Sciences(37 pts)#2832Universidade Federal de São João del-Rei(37 pts)#2834Revista Elo - Dialogos em Extensao(37 pts)#2835Gatha Cognition(37 pts)

Nexus Score

37/ 100

+23 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,679

204 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,833

4,884 works

Ranked #1,679 for recent publications vs #2,833 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.1 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.6 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.8 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

18.7 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	27	F	22%	7%	1%	1%	98%
Edited Books	24	F	18%	38%	33%	4%	31%
Monographs	17	F	20%	10%	15%	5%	33%
Book Chapters	17	F	19%	0%	33%	0%	34%
Proceedings	10	F	20%	0%	33%	0%	0%
Proceedings	5	F	20%	0%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	52%	7.9 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	66%	13.2 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	20%	1.0 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	20%	2.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	15%	1.5 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	99%	6.9 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	88%	6.2 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	86%	5.2 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+14 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 9% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 36% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+11 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 4% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

CIRAD (Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Recherche Agronomique Pour le Developpement)

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Organizations

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results