RN Score

Korean Association of Urogenital Tract Infection and Inflammation

Seoul, South Korea · Member ID: 5765 · 248 total works

Nexus Score

64/ 100
C
+5 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#180

67

47 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#48

62

201 works

Ranked #180 for recent publications vs #48 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

24.5 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

16.3 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.3 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

4.0 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

15.8 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

94%
14.0 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

Similarity Check

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

89%
17.9 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

32%
1.6 / 5Needs Work

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

34%
3.4 / 10Needs Work

Award Numbers

funding

19%
1.9 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

62%
3.7 / 6Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+12 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
2

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 22% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Access

+0 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 79% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 6 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.