Science Exploration Press

Singapore, Singapore · Member ID: 51171 · 350 total works

Global Rank

#468

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 2%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#466Grupo Editorial Eirene S. de R. L.(52 pts)#467Sociedad Paraguaya de Nefrología(52 pts)#469Programa de Pós-graduação em Artes Cênicas(52 pts)#470Editorial Cientifica Doso(52 pts)

Nexus Score

52/ 100

-17 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,267

306 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#468

44 works

Ranked #3,267 for recent publications vs #468 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

18.7 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

15.1 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

5.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.5 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

11.9 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	44%	6.6 / 15	Needs Work
Update Policies provenance	98%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
Similarity Check provenance	99%	4.9 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	82%	16.5 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	18%	0.9 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	10%	1.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	2%	0.2 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	2%	0.2 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	23%	1.6 / 7	Needs Work
Full-text Links access	20%	1.4 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	91%	5.4 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 7% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 33% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+4 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 59% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Science Exploration Press

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Add License Information

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results