CodeDay

Seattle, WA, United States · Member ID: 50530 · 3 total works

Global Rank

#2,038

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 7%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2036Biomed(42 pts)#2037Rift Valley Technical Training Institute(42 pts)#2039Yayasan Centre for Studying and Milieu Development of Indonesia (CESMiD)(42 pts)#2040Philippine Society of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology(42 pts)

Nexus Score

42/ 100

Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#3,509

2 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,038

1 works

Ranked #3,509 for recent publications vs #2,038 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

0.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

20.0 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

15.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

7.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Posted ContentTOP	42	D	0%	100%	100%	0%	35%
Datasets	42	D	0%	100%	100%	0%	35%
Database	10	F	0%	0%	67%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	0%	0.0 / 15	Poor
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ORCID Coverage people	100%	20.0 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	100%	10.0 / 10	Excellent
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	0%	0.0 / 6	Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Provenance

+20 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+9 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 35% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

CodeDay

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Provenance

Improve Funding

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Deposit Complete References

Add Funder Information

Add Full-Text URLs

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Abstracts

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results