Science Publishing Group

New York, NY, United States · Member ID: 4911 · 42,497 total works

Global Rank

#5,933

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 21%

of all publishers

To Reach Top 10%

+11

points needed

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#5931Japanese Association for the Study of Pain(26 pts)#5932Chimera Innova Group(26 pts)#5934National Documentation Centre (EKT)(26 pts)#5935Tenri Foundation, Tenri Institute of Medical Research(26 pts)

Nexus Score

26/ 100

+45 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,005

8,768 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#5,933

33,729 works

Ranked #2,005 for recent publications vs #5,933 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

9.4 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

7.8 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.8 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.0 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

6.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	96%	14.4 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	23%	1.1 / 5	Needs Work
ORCID Coverage people	78%	15.5 / 20	Good
Affiliations (Text) organizations	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Full-text Links access	96%	6.7 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	96%	5.8 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 0% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+11 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+10 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 31% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Science Publishing Group

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Provenance

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Add License Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results