RN Score

Korean Society for Food Science of Animal Resources

Yongsan-gu, Seoul, South Korea · Member ID: 3872 · 89 total works

Nexus Score

58/ 100
C
Stable vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#666

57

42 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#172

59

47 works

Ranked #666 for recent publications vs #172 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

20.5 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

15.5 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.0 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

9.5 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

12.4 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

All works are journal articles — the aggregate score above is accurate.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

76%
11.4 / 15Good

Update Policies

provenance

76%
3.8 / 5Good

Similarity Check

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

76%
15.2 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

50%
5.0 / 10Good

Award Numbers

funding

43%
4.3 / 10Needs Work

Licenses

access

76%
5.3 / 7Good

Full-text Links

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

0%
0.0 / 6Poor

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

2

Improve Funding

+6 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 48% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Access

+4 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 62% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 8 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.