Universidad de la Sabana

Chia, Cundinamarca, Colombia · Member ID: 3246 · 2,765 total works

Global Rank

#1,904

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 7%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#1902National Taiwan University(42 pts)#1903Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery(42 pts)#1905New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering(42 pts)#1906Universidade Estadual de Londrina(42 pts)

Nexus Score

42/ 100

+30 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#707

339 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,904

2,426 works

Ranked #707 for recent publications vs #1,904 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

12.6 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.3 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

1.4 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.5 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
ReportsTOP	41	D	60%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Journal Articles	35	D	60%	48%	14%	4%	37%
Book Chapters	30	F	27%	87%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	24	F	10%	78%	0%	0%	28%
Dissertations	21	F	60%	0%	0%	0%	30%
Books	2	F	0%	2%	0%	0%	8%
Monographs	1	F	0%	4%	0%	0%	3%
Journal Issues	0	F	0%	1%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	85%	12.7 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	78%	3.9 / 5	Good
Similarity Check provenance	80%	4.0 / 5	Good
ORCID Coverage people	88%	17.6 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	80%	4.0 / 5	Good
ROR IDs organizations	13%	1.3 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	11%	1.1 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	11%	1.1 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	80%	5.6 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	0%	0.0 / 7	Poor
Abstracts access	92%	5.5 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 7% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 22% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Access

+8 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 42% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Universidad de la Sabana

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Access

Improvement Recommendations

Add Full-Text URLs

Add Funder Information

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Deposit Complete References

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results