Estrabao

Blumenau, SC, Brazil · Member ID: 31473 · 194 total works

Global Rank

#156

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 1%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#154Lviv Medical Institute LLC(59 pts)#155Shakarim University(59 pts)#157Study Centre for National Reconciliation(59 pts)#158Plural - Revista de Psicologia Unesp Bauru(59 pts)

Nexus Score

59/ 100

+9 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#324

57 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#156

137 works

Ranked #324 for recent publications vs #156 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

18.9 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

17.6 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

0.1 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

3.1 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

19.0 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
Journal ArticlesTOP	60	C	79%	85%	1%	14%	99%
Monographs	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Books	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Edited Books	26	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	30%
Book Chapters	20	F	0%	100%	0%	0%	0%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	100%	15.0 / 15	Excellent
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	100%	5.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	93%	18.6 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
ROR IDs organizations	0%	0.0 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	25%	2.5 / 10	Needs Work
Award Numbers funding	19%	1.9 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Full-text Links access	100%	7.0 / 7	Excellent
Abstracts access	100%	6.0 / 6	Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+13 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+12 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 1% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+1 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 76% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Estrabao

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results