RN Score

Wiley

Hoboken, NJ, United States · Member ID: 311 · 12,004,156 total works

Nexus Score

43/ 100
D
+12 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#1,434

50

987,360 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,564

37

11,016,796 works

Ranked #1,434 for recent publications vs #1,564 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

16.6 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

7.5 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.3 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

3.7 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

13.3 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP42D
Posted Content25F
Other23F
Reference Entry19F
Monographs14F
Edited Books13F
Book Chapters11F
Reference Books8F
Journal Issues8F
Book Series8F
Books6F
Components3F
Journals2F
Datasets2F
Reports0F
Proceedings0F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

67%
10.0 / 15Good

Update Policies

provenance

71%
3.6 / 5Good

Similarity Check

provenance

79%
3.9 / 5Good

ORCID Coverage

people

62%
12.3 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

67%
3.3 / 5Good

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

30%
3.0 / 10Needs Work

Award Numbers

funding

25%
2.5 / 10Needs Work

Licenses

access

76%
5.3 / 7Good

Full-text Links

access

25%
1.8 / 7Needs Work

Abstracts

access

63%
3.8 / 6Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+12 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 19% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
2

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 15% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve People

+9 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 37% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 9 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.