RN Score

Nizhnevartovsk State University

Nizhnevartovsk, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Area - Yugra, Russia · Member ID: 22929 · 1,256 total works

Nexus Score

43/ 100
D
+30 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#642

58

228 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,820

28

1,028 works

Ranked #642 for recent publications vs #1,820 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

12.6 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

13.7 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

2.4 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.2 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

14.2 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Book ChaptersTOP62C
Journal Articles51C
Books26F
Proceedings18F
Edited Books6F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

96%
14.5 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

89%
4.5 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

82%
16.4 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

89%
4.4 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

89%
6.3 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

89%
6.2 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

98%
5.9 / 6Excellent
Your book chapters score 62 (Grade C) — strong work on your primary research outputs! The tips below reflect your aggregate coverage across all content types, where there's still room to grow.

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Organizations

+10 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 16% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Provenance

+8 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 50% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.