Helsinki University Press

Helsinki, Finland · Member ID: 18616 · 1,608 total works

Global Rank

#2,295

of 28,608

Percentile

Top 8%

of all publishers

View Full Leaderboard

Nearby in Rankings:

#2293Stowarzyszenie Centrum Badan nad Zaglada Zydow(40 pts)#2294Recep Tayyip Erdogan Universitesi(40 pts)#2296Performance Studies International(40 pts)#2297Scientia Socialis Ltd(40 pts)

Nexus Score

40/ 100

+13 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#2,608

328 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,295

1,280 works

Ranked #2,608 for recent publications vs #2,295 overall — recent work trailing historical performance

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.0 / 25

People

ORCID coverage

11.4 / 20

Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

1.0 / 15

Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.7 / 20

Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

13.8 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content Type	Score	Grade	Prov	People	Orgs	Fund	Access
MonographsTOP	37	D	36%	95%	9%	0%	38%
Journal Articles	37	D	51%	25%	0%	2%	92%
Edited Books	35	D	20%	96%	16%	0%	44%
Book Chapters	34	F	38%	79%	13%	0%	36%
Books	22	F	20%	67%	0%	0%	20%

Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.

Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

Metric	Coverage	Points	Status
References provenance	74%	11.1 / 15	Good
Update Policies provenance	0%	0.0 / 5	Poor
Similarity Check provenance	80%	4.0 / 5	Excellent
ORCID Coverage people	88%	17.5 / 20	Excellent
Affiliations (Text) organizations	27%	1.3 / 5	Needs Work
ROR IDs organizations	4%	0.4 / 10	Poor
Funder Registry funding	7%	0.7 / 10	Poor
Award Numbers funding	5%	0.6 / 10	Poor
Licenses access	60%	4.2 / 7	Good
Full-text Links access	33%	2.3 / 7	Needs Work
Abstracts access	71%	4.3 / 6	Good

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

Improve Funding

+15 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 3% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Organizations

+11 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 6% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Improve Provenance

+7 pts potential

Add reference lists to your DOI deposits. Even partial references help establish citation links.

Current: 52% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Helsinki University Press

Score Breakdown by Era

Dimension Breakdown

Dimension Profile

Score by Content Type

Detailed Metrics

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Improve Funding

Improve Organizations

Improve Provenance

Improvement Recommendations

Add ROR IDs for Affiliations

Add Funder Information

Include Award/Grant Numbers

Include Author Affiliations

Enable Crossmark

About This Score

Crossref Reports

Share Results