RN Score

American Meteorological Society

Boston, MA, United States · Member ID: 12 · 129,281 total works

Nexus Score

41/ 100
D
+52 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#206

67

4,340 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#2,052

15

124,941 works

Ranked #206 for recent publications vs #2,052 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.3 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

6.0 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

3.1 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

7.5 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

10.8 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
ReportsTOP16F
Journal Articles16F
Journal Issues12F
Components1F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

88%
13.2 / 15Excellent

Update Policies

provenance

0%
0.0 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

100%
5.0 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

59%
11.7 / 20Good

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

92%
4.6 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Funder Registry

funding

70%
7.0 / 10Good

Award Numbers

funding

66%
6.6 / 10Good

Licenses

access

89%
6.3 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

100%
7.0 / 7Excellent

Abstracts

access

89%
5.3 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve People

+10 pts potential

Include ORCID iDs for authors. Encourage authors to authenticate their ORCID during submission.

Current: 30% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
2

Improve Organizations

+9 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 20% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Funding

+8 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

Current: 38% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 6 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.