RN Score

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Krakow, Poland · Member ID: 10051 · 15,864 total works

Nexus Score

42/ 100
D
+25 points vs historical

Score Breakdown by Era

Current

Last 2 years

#872

55

4,026 works

Backfile

Older than 2 years

#1,950

30

11,838 works

Ranked #872 for recent publications vs #1,950 overall — improving with recent work

Dimension Breakdown

Provenance

References, update policies, similarity check

13.7 / 25
People

ORCID coverage

14.6 / 20
Organizations

Affiliations and ROR IDs

5.2 / 15
Funding

Funder registry and award numbers

0.2 / 20
Access

Licenses, full-text links, abstracts

8.6 / 20

Dimension Profile

Visual overview of metadata coverage across all five dimensions.

Score by Content Type

Scores calculated separately for each content type registered with Crossref. The aggregate score above includes all types.

Content TypeScoreGrade
Journal ArticlesTOP37D
Book Chapters23F
Monographs21F
Edited Books17F
Journals0F
Non-article content types (reviews, components, corrections) typically have lower metadata coverage, which can reduce the aggregate score above.
Want to compare by content type? The leaderboard supports filtering by content type — use it to see how publishers rank for journal articles, peer reviews, or other types individually.

Detailed Metrics

MetricCoveragePointsStatus

References

provenance

77%
11.5 / 15Good

Update Policies

provenance

5%
0.2 / 5Poor

Similarity Check

provenance

97%
4.9 / 5Excellent

ORCID Coverage

people

89%
17.8 / 20Excellent

Affiliations (Text)

organizations

87%
4.3 / 5Excellent

ROR IDs

organizations

44%
4.4 / 10Needs Work

Funder Registry

funding

0%
0.0 / 10Poor

Award Numbers

funding

1%
0.1 / 10Poor

Licenses

access

90%
6.3 / 7Excellent

Full-text Links

access

1%
0.1 / 7Poor

Abstracts

access

82%
4.9 / 6Excellent

Quick Wins to Improve Your Ranking

Small metadata improvements can significantly boost your score. Here are the highest-impact changes you can make:

1

Improve Funding

+16 pts potential

Include funder information using Open Funder Registry IDs and grant/award numbers.

2

Improve Organizations

+7 pts potential

Add author affiliations with ROR IDs. The ROR API can help match institution names to IDs.

Current: 35% coverageView Crossref Documentation →
3

Improve Access

+7 pts potential

Add abstracts, license URLs (using SPDX identifiers), and full-text links to your metadata.

Current: 43% coverageView Crossref Documentation →

Pro Tip: Focus on your current (recent) publications first. Improving metadata on new deposits is easier than updating backfiles, and it will immediately improve your "current" coverage scores.

Improvement Recommendations

Actionable steps to improve your Nexus Score

Showing 5 of 7 recommendations

About This Score

Data Source
Crossref /members API
Last Updated
5/9/2026

Crossref Reports

View detailed metadata coverage on Crossref's official tools.

Share Results

Share your Research Nexus Score with stakeholders or use it in reports.